Doug Fiedor
Another Attack From The Left
(Newsletter #263 - A Weekly View from the Foothills of Appalachia)
Here comes a lesson in the far left’s idea of "objective
journalism." It appears they are not yet ready to attack President
Bush’s ideas, so they are starting to go after him personally.
For instance, New York Times reporter Frank Bruni was one of the
reporters assigned to cover Bush during the 2000 presidential
campaign. Later, he covered a few months of Bush’s presidency. So, of
course, Bruni thinks that qualifies him to write not just a newspaper
article or two but a whole book about Dubya.
Bruni, an inhabitant of the concrete jungle where daily life often
appears to border on the line between chaos and mayhem -- yet some of
the residents actually believe they are at the center of America’s
"culture" -- describes President Bush as affable and good-natured but
shallow and largely clueless about many aspects of the culture of the
nation he heads.
Bruni’s book, "Ambling into History," claims to derive at least
some of its presuppositions from Bush’s interaction with reporters on
the campaign trail. "At long last, the Republican Party had nominated
its first baby boomer for the presidency, and the man they had chosen
was no more culturally ’with it’ than Bob Dole, the septuagenarian
previous nominee, had been," Bruni writes.
Among the things Bruni harps about are that Bush had never heard
of actor Leonardo DiCaprio or television newscaster Stone Phillips --
"despite the enormous nationwide exposure of both." Or, when asked
about HBO’s sitcom "Sex and the City," Bruni reports that Bush
thought the sitcom was "an inquiry into his erotic and geographic
whereabouts." Sounding like a typical New York City culture vulture
who is convinced his existence is far superior than the rest of the
world’s, Bruni writes that when reporters on the campaign trail used
New York colloquialisms like "vegan" or "yenta," Bush had no idea
what they were talking about.
Problem is, folks like Bruni cannot understand that not all people
in America care about things like HBO’s ongoing tribulations of a
trollop, a goofball and a ding-bat living in that concrete jungle
called New York City. Put Bruni & friends out in our vast
Midwest, the hills of Kentucky or Tennessee, or Texas, and see how
much they know then! New York City is but a small fraction of the
total culture that makes up the United States and is most certainly
not representative of the whole.
Meanwhile, the daughter of House Democratic Whip Nancy Pelosi has
strung together her interpretation of President Bush relaxing while
on the campaign trail. From our point of view, the Bush campaign
should have known better. Alexandra Pelosi might sometimes call
herself a "journalist," but first she is the daughter of one of
Congress’s most liberal Democrats.
Anyway, folks in the Bush campaign knew Pelosi was videoing many
of the more relaxed moments on the campaign trail and got quite a lot
of footage of Bush. Of course, there was an agreement with Bush
campaign officials that the material "was for personal use" only.
But, making an agreement with a liberal Democrat who has saleable
material that could be embarrassing to a conservative president is .
. . well . . . rather worthless. Let’s face it, those on the far left
are not famous for keeping their word. Rather, they tend to be a
self-aggrandizing lot. And, Pelosi smelled a buck to be made.
Therefore, the often unflattering 90-minute movie she calls "Journeys
With George" was screened publicly on March 8 at an Austin, Texas,
film festival.
Frank Bruni, we might add, describes Pelosi as "the unrivaled
queen of the pack when it came to self- amusement and
consequences-be-damned diversion." A "dingbat" was the colloquialism
those of us in the Midwest used to use for someone like that.
Later, Matt Labash reported in The Weekly Standard that "Pelosi
had conducted a super-secret margarita- fueled straw poll among
reporters in the back of the [Bush campaign] plane about who
they thought would win the election. Most predicted Al Gore. Somebody
leaked the results to outside media." That made many of the
Washington press corps covering the Bush campaign "embarrassed by the
disclosure, and fearful that it would cost them access to Bush."
That is what is called "objective journalism" by the Washington
press corps nowadays -- a pack of liberals covering a conservative
candidate.
Then came the "make believe" White House, as in Aaron Sorkin,
producer of the far left "West Wing" television program. According to
Matt Drudge, it appears that Sorkin asked that some of the real White
House players appear in an upcoming episode. The administration,
being just a little busy these days, turned Sorkin down. So, Sorkin
went off on a public rant, disparaging President Bush, and some
"journalists" quoted Sorkin’s babble as actual news.
And so goes the never-ending attack of the far-left media on the
real America they have never come to understand. Most have never seen
Americans working to build quality products so they will last a few
years and be competitive. Nor have they watched how attentively a
farmer cares for his cows, poultry or hogs. They do not see the
children studying at the kitchen table after doing their chores and
the dinner dishes, watch all the little Midwest churches fill up on
Sunday morning or know just the simple joy of shopping in town while
also socializing with nearly everyone around you.
Instead, they scratch out their existence in an environment where
their "America" is little more than the steel and glass of
skyscrapers, the heavy traffic on the concrete outside and living on
the edge because there is a constant hassle and danger coming from
every direction. Then they go home at night and triple lock the doors
of their small apartment in their guarded building and hope they will
be safe till morning.
That is not the real America, of course. But, that is all they
know. That may also explain a lot of why so much of what they write
and broadcast seems so snippy.
Doug Fiedor