Doug Fiedor
Another New IRS Regulation
(Newsletter #264 - A Weekly View from the Foothills of Appalachia)
Anyone remember that so called "Taxpayer Bill of Rights" act that
was passed a couple years ago? That bill was rather bland, but did
have a couple provisions that could be beneficial to a few people.
Actually, I thought the IRS would just disregard it, as they do with
most laws and court rulings they don’t like. But, then I stumbled
upon a new Internal Revenue Service "Notice of proposed
rulemaking."
The March 5 Federal register (Volume 67, Number 43; page
9929-9934) announces 26 CFR Part 301 [Reg-107366-00], which
is a proposed rule to provide for a "Civil Cause of Action for
Damages Caused by Unlawful Tax Collection Actions, Including Actions
Taken in Violation of Section 362 or Section 524 of the Bankruptcy
Code."(1)
The first reason this caught my attention was because of the words
"Caused by Unlawful Tax Collection Actions" and "Civil Cause of
Action" used in the same sentence.
The words "Unlawful Tax Collection Actions" bring to mind
coercion, fraud, intimidation and threat under color of official
position. This, in turn, brings to mind the "deprivation of rights
under color of law" statute (18 USC 242), which applies to government
agents overstepping their authority:
"Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation,
or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, or
District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities
secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United
States, . . . shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than one year, or both . . ."
Over the years, I have repeatedly asked elected officials a simple
question: "Why are government officials not bound by the law?" That
is, if an American citizen breaks the law and steals from others, men
with guns come to hunt him down. Yet, government officials get a free
pass to do the same thing. Shouldn’t government officials be held to
a higher standard than the average citizen? After all, they are in a
much better position to know exactly what the law is.
Apparently not. From the well published illegal antics of Bill
Clinton to the thousands of well documented misdeeds of minor
bureaucrats, it doesn’t seem to matter what they do or how many
people they harm. In most cases, bureaucrats have immunity from
prosecution for violating the law.
And so it is in this case. Herein, when an agent of the government
violates the law, the people of the United States, as a whole, will
pay the victim and the perpetrator will continue drawing a government
paycheck.
Anyway, there is a proposed rule change at Treasury that could
help some people. The proposed regulation relates to "civil causes of
action for damages caused by unlawful collection actions of officers
and employees of the IRS and the awarding of costs and certain fees.
The proposed regulations reflect amendments made by the Taxpayer Bill
of Rights and the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform
Act of 1998. The proposed regulations affect all persons who suffer
damages caused by unlawful collection actions of officers or
employees of the IRS."
The proposed regulation would amended section 7433 of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 by increasing the maximum amount of damages a
taxpayer may be awarded for unlawful collection actions from $100,000
to $1,000,000.
Also, "reasonable administrative costs may be awarded to the
prevailing party in an administrative proceeding brought by or
against the United States in connection with the determination,
collection, or refund of any tax, interest, or penalty under Title
26." Previously, taxpayers were generally not entitled to recover
costs for administrative proceedings in connection with collection
matters. The current regulations exclude such collection matters.
As with most proposed regulations, there is a period for comments
and requests for a public hearing. "Consideration will be given to
any written comments that are submitted timely (preferably a signed
original and eight (8) copies) to the IRS. Alternatively, taxpayers
may submit comments electronically to the IRS Internet at
www.irs.gov/regs. All comments will be available for public
inspection and copying."
Written comments and requests for a public hearing must be
received by June 3, 2002. Send submissions to: CC:ITA:RU
(Reg-107366-00), room 5226, Internal Revenue Service, POB 7604, Ben
Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044. Or, if you don’t trust postal
delivery, submissions may be hand delivered to: CC:ITA:RU
(Reg-107366-00), room 5226, Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC.
Doug Fiedor