|
Date - November 27, 2001
From Judicial Atrocities to our Annual Sex-in-Israel Survey
Now, one of the best analyses of the biased judiciary has been composed
by Professor Eliav Shochetman from the Hebrew University’s law school.
Shochetman in the past led the campaign against the misuse of the law
criminalizing "failure to prevent a crime", used by the McCarthyist Attorney
General to prosecute Margalit Har-Sheffi who was guilty of nothing except
dubious taste in choosing her dates.
Shochetman is one of Israel’s leading law scholars. Unfortunately, his
new volume is only available in Hebrew, although English synopsies might be.
It came out as a policy study with the Ariel Center for Policy Research,
(www.acpr.org.il)
The new volume is entitled "Justice Justice Shalt Thou Pursue".
Shochetman’s study focuses on a judicial atrocity that we have also had
occasion to comment upon over the years. The case involved one Nahum
Korman, a 30-ish religious security officer at a "settlement" in the West
Bank. One day in 1997 Korman was driving along next to Husan near
Bethlehem, when a group of Palestinian guttersnipes were minding their own
business and simply throwing rocks at cars with Jews inside, including
Korman’s. Korman stopped, got out, and chased them. He caught one of them,
an 11 year old (some say 12 year old) guttersnipe named Hilmi Shusha. He
struck (or perhaps kicked) the child once. The child fell and died. Korman
tried to revive him and called in an ambulance.
Hilmi then became the poster child for the usual leftists intent on
proving that Palestinians are the perpetual victims of barbarous Israeli
"settlers" who have long noses and are greedy, backward, unhygienic, and
reject the Oslo Messiah. The usual glut of "human rights" groups, those who
think the Palestinians have a human right to murder Jews and destroy Israel,
marched in also, led by Amnesty and Betselem, and practically deified the
guttersnipe.
Meanwhile, the Israeli Left and the politicized McCarthyists at the
Attorney General’s office decided to make a political example out of Korman.
They tried him for manslaughter.
Among the problems of the McCarthyists was that the postmortem pathology
report did not support their position. The State Pathologist reported that
junior may have had a congenital problem with an artery, and so being
slapped or just being scared by a raging settler he had just provoked might
have caused the death. Similarly, he might have died when he fell and
struck his head on a rock, and not because he got slapped by Korman. In
any case, Korman’s behavior was that of a justifiably angry driver, not of a
killer, and the fact that he gave the child mouth-to-mouth and called in an
ambulance hardly shows the personality of a mad murderer.
Korman was at first acquited, but Israel does NOT have protection against
double jeopardy. With all the international hullabaloo, Israel’s official
Leftists at the Attorney General’s office could not let the case go. They
retried Korman, and eventually it went to the Supreme Court on appeal.
Ultimately Korman was sentenced to six months and to pay 70,000 NIS to the
family of the child.
Now such a punishment would be a crime if Korman had really committed a
crime and killed anyone. But it is just as much a crime if Korman was
guilty of nothing other than slapping a brat who had thrown a rock at his
car. Let us keep in mind that such Palestinian rock throwing has resulted
in deaths and maimings. Just imagine what the US Marines in Afghanistan
will do if any Taliban guttersnipes throw rocks at them!
Shochetman analyzed the trial and appeal in his volume. While I cannot
do it justice, it is an overwhelming indictment of the politicalization and
bias of Israel’s Supreme Court. The Supreme Court ignored the official
report of the state pathologist, who had concluded that there was no
evidence that the child had died because he had been slapped by Korman, and
the Supreme Court decreed in its fatwa that Korman HAD killed him. This was
a total violation of the role of the Court. In Israel, like elsewhere,
appeals courts do not change or add or challenge FACTS, discovered at the
lower court level, but rather only review trial procedure and application of
law. But not in the Korman case. The Supreme Court illegally overstepped
its role and arbitrarily set aside facts and issued a judgement based on
political bias and the desire to make a political statement and example of
Korman.
Meanwhile, the latest stage in the PLO’s peace process is to fire mortar
shells into the homes of settlers (including in Jerusalem neighborhoods)
while the Israeli government and military do absolutely nothing to stop this
- other than occasionally shooting a mid-level terrorist, or sending in
tanks for a few hours and then back out. Any suicide bomber attacking
settlers is assured a grand pageant of a funeral, as Israel still hands back
corpses of these to the PLO to be celebrated and beatified (like the bomber
at Erez yesterday), rather than burying it in a pigskin in a landfill. Not
a day goes by in which settler cars are not fired upon by the PLO’s
"police".
Since I am of a helping disposition, I thought I would propose a
solution. Since Israel’s government obviously has no intention to defend
the settlers, the only reasonable and moderate solution is to allow the
settlers to set up their own independent army. The settler militia would
be called the SDO, or the Settler Defense Organization, or - if you prefer a
Hebrew name - El-Kasach. It would be armed with heavy artillery, concussion
bombs, napalm, smart bombs, tanks, aircraft carriers, neutron bombs, you
name it. But it would independent of Israel. Whenever the PLO’s
stormtroopers fire mortars at a "settlement", the settler militia would open
up with all weapons. Israel’s own government would say Tch Tch when all
those BBC reports and EU protests arrive, but would point out that this
militia is simply beyond its control and not sponsored by Israel, almost
like the Hamas being independent of the PLO. The settler militia would
decide on the appropriate response to attacks on any settlements by the PLO,
not the Israeli Defense Forces.
Now in fairness, since Israel would not be accountable or responsible for
defending the settlers, the settler militia would not automatically rush to
defend Israel if it would be attacked by aggressors. After all, fair is
fair, and sauce for the goose is sauce for the lemming.
Yes I know. You are asking yourself why such an obviously perfect
solution has not been proposed long ago, and why we all had to wait for ME
to propose it!
LONDON (November 27) - The collective Israeli libido
(see, they seem to have mis-spelled lobotomy)
has risen over the past year, placing Israel among the
most sexually active countries on Earth, according to
the 2001 Durex Global Sex Survey being published
today.
(Either that, or the Israeli penchant for juvenile bragging -- cyber)
Not surprisingly, Israelis also rated lovemaking as
their favorite pastime. (In the case of Meretz voters, their partner
is made of vinyl and wears a kafiya --- cyber) The survey, which covered
28
countries worldwide, was conducted among 500 Israelis
by the condom manufacturer.
It found Israelis make love on average 110 times a
Year (counting Shimon Peres meeting with PLO officials -- cyber), up from 105 times in the previous year. This
places Israel in the top league of lovers, ahead of
Britain (107), Germany (105), and Holland (94), but
still behind the US (124).
(Survey did not make clear if hands count as lovers -- cyber)
Israelis also rated having sex as their favorite
pastime. Some 23 percent of adults declared lovemaking
was their top leisure-time activity, while 20%
preferred socializing with friends, and 13% would
rather watch television, .
(Of course, if you could SEE what Israel has on its television,
you would understand -- cyber)
Israelis would most like to make love on a beach or in
a whirlpool bath, spa or hot tub. (Members of the opposite sex need not be
present -- cyber)
While 10% of
Italians would enjoy sex on the kitchen table, this
was the preference of just 3% of Israelis.
(Gotta separate the milk from the meat --- cyber)
At the same time, however, the survey showed that
young Israelis hold on to their virginity longer than
youngsters in other countries. (And when they say HOLD on, they mean it ---
cyber)
While the average age
for first sex is 16 years in the US and 16.7 years in
France, average Israelis have their first serious
encounter at 17.
Israelis are also found to have fewer sexual partners
- an average of 8.1 - than most other countries (an
average of 14.3 in the US). But some 8% of Israelis
surveyed have had more than 20 partners.
(and 72% of Israeli men were found to be lying through their teeth -- cyber)
On average, Israeli children are 13.8 years old when
they receive their first sex education. (They are only 7 though when
they are taught that Israel’s creation was a catastrophe for Arabs and
Jews are to blame -- cyber) Fully 31% said
they did not learn the facts of life in school.
(They were referring to facts of life about the Arab-Israeli conflict --
cyber)
Almost one-fifth of Israelis surveyed preferred to
learn about sex from their partners (peace partners, i.e., the PLO --
cyber),
while 15% would
opt for sex education at school and 14% from
healthcare professionals.
The survey also found four in 10 Israelis were worried
about contracting HIV/AIDS and other
sexually-transmitted diseases, although 26% take no
measures to protect themselves. (45% take no measures to protect themselves
against PLO nazism -- cyber) Of those who insist on
protection, only 18% use condoms for casual sex and
just 11% would ask their partners about their sexual
histories.
(The Sharon government thinks condoms are the best way to stop PLO mortar
shelling of "settlements -- cyber)
For a good response to this, see
http://www.opinionet.com/commentary/contributors/ccsp/ccsp38.htm
Steven Plaut
Copyright © 2001 by Steven Plaut. -Published with permission
© 1999-2001 by OpinioNet(tm), All Rights Reserved |