1. The BARAK PLAN to Destroy Jerusalem

   So let us summarize the Nebaraknezzar plan to destroy Jerusalem.

   After three months of nonstop atrocities and the violation of every comma in the Oslo accords by the PLO fascists, Barak continues to pursue his policy that no act of violence by Arabs must go unrewarded. With less than a quarter of the Knesset behind him, with the polls showing the vast majority of the public opposes his policies, trailing behind every conceivable opposition candidate in the polls, the lame duck Barak has agreed in principle to accept Clinton’s proposed "compromise" for a Middle East settlement.

   This "compromise" is a Munich capitulation. It is based on the destruction of Jerusalem. Israel would turn over the entire Old City of Jerusalem to the PLO fascists, who would base their Wehrmacht therein, much like the situation before 1967, and use the walls of the Old City to shell Western Jerusalem. Israel would be left with the Jewish Quarter of the Old City and a "safe conduct corridor" to it and the Western Wall, which will be as safe as was the safe-conduct corridor to Joseph’s Tomb in Nablus. The PLO will be granted all of East Jerusalem, including the Mount of Olives, the mountain on which are buried the Prophets of Israel. The Hebrew University campus on Mount Scopus will become the new front lines for gunfire, which is the only good part of the agreement.

   Once inside Jerusalem, the PLO will destroy every vestige of Jewish history and religion in the Old City. They will reduce the Western Wall to gravel. They will raze the synagogues there, the same synagogues that had been destroyed by the Jordanians after 1949 - many centuries old - and then rebuilt by Israel after 1967. They will destroy Rachael’s Tomb.

   In exchange for this Munich capitulation, the PLO will not agree to forego demanding the "Right of Return" of Palestinian "refugees" to Israel proper, even after Barak admits 150,000 of them. Refusing to abandon their demand for the "Right of Return" is tantamount to refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of Israel in ANY borders whatsoever. But Barak and the Left will not desist. The Arabs will continue to demand removal of Jewish settlers from the Galilee and Negev. The Western press will report daily about the inequality and mistreatment of Arabs in what is left of Israel and demand that Israel implement ending of apartheid by dezionization of the country and by merging rump Israel into a secular Palestinian state from the Mediterranean to the Jordan. Israeli poets and professors will endorse this proposal.

   No doubt resolution of the conflict over the "Right of Return" will be put off by Barak and the Left until much later. Barak will seek to get Arafat to say that the Palestinians have no further claims upon Israel and are satisfied with what they have gotten in the Munich capitulation. After all, Hitler at Munich said HE was now satisfied. Arafat will refuse, or - at most - issue some sort of statement with duplicitous language, and Barak and Peres and Beilin and Sarid will have a peace festival in celebration of the statement. Regardless of what Arafat will say, the violence will escalate and gunfire and shells will rain down upon Israel from the Palestinian state and from the Lebanese border. Syria and Egypt will prepare to intervene militarily.

   The new battle lines in the Middle East will shift from the Gilo suburb to the Old City of Jerusalem. The world will insist that Israel evacuate its settlers from the Jewish Quarter in the Old City. Jews will be murdered every day trying to reach the Western Wall. This is Barak’s Hannuka gift to Israel.

   The Jordan Valley will be turned over to the PLO and its settlements forcibly evacuated. This is so that it will be easier for the PLO to admit the Iraqi and Iranian troops crossing over the Jordan River into Palestine to prepare for the coming showdown. Iran yesterday promised to reward Israeli generosity by shooting missiles at it. (Haaretz Dec 26.).

   Barak has already agreed that unlike the evacuation of the Sinai, the homes of settlers will not be destroyed when abandoned and will be turned over in tact to the PLO fascists. Barak has already ruled that any abandoned settler homes now are to be already "sold" to the Palestinian Authority (Haaretz Dec 26, 00).

   Barak has already agreed in principle that swaths of pre-1967 Israel will also be handed to the PLO fascists. The more atrocities the PLO launches, the larger the swaths he will grant them.

   When Barak was running for office, not only to he deny that he had any intentions of dividing Jerusalem, but he even insisted that anyone from the Opposition CLAIMING he had such intentions should be jailed for criminal incitement.

2. In the current elections, the Arab Stalinist-Fascist anti-Jewish political parties of Israel have decided NOT to run their own candidate for Prime Minister. That is because Ehud Barak is ALREADY running as their candidate.

3. Question: What is the difference between an innocent dead Arab and an innocent dead Jew in the Middle East of Ehud Nebaraknezzar?

   Answer: The dead Arab is worth 156,000 shekels. The dead Jew is worthless.

   That is the only possible conclusion from the trial at the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court that ended yesterday.

   The tort trial had to do with the accidental killing of a 14 year old Palestinian by a settler. It took place in the middle of the Gulf War. As you recall, in the Gulf War the Palestinians showed their commitment to peace by marching about and demanding that Saddam annihilate all the Jews with chemical weapons and then dancing on the rooftops each time a Scud landed. None of which persuaded the Israeli Left that there just might be a difficulty or two in their plans to buy peace by making concessions to the Palestinians. In the midst of all this, the Palestinians also attacked Jews at random on the highways and byways.

   In one of these attacks on Jews to show solidarity with Saddam, the Jew being attacked got out of his car and fired into the air to dissuade the peace partners. Physics being what it is, the bullets eventually landed on earth and one accidentally hit a 14 year old Palestinian boy in a nearby village. The "settler" was then held liable for the death of the boy due to "negligence". (Haaretz Dec 26). No the Arabs attacking him were not held responsible at all for the boy’s death. Come on now, this is ISRAEL!!

   In a civil suit, the "settler" was yesterday ordered to pay 156,000 shekels plus legal costs to the family of the dead boy.

   And in all the countless incidents where Arabs murder Jews? Not out of "negligence" but as intentional premeditated murder? In how many of THOSE cases was the perp held to be civilly culpable and responsible for damages and forced to pay? I mean, even OJ was held to be civilly liable?

   We will give you a hint. It is the same number as the number of Oslo commitments that have been complied with by the PLO.

Copyright © 2000 by Steven Plaut.
All Rights Reserved.

-Published with permission