|
Date - December 30, 2000
What to do with a Baton?
Well That Jew Barenboim is in Tel Aviv this week and he decided to
expand upon his Jewish solidarity beyond merely making merry music for the
Germans. He decided to tell the Israelis what to do politically.
Naturally, his tirade was politically correct. The Jews must give the Old
City of Jerusalem over to the PLO fascists and they should hand over the
Temple Mount and create a Palestinian state even BEFORE conducting any
"peace negotiations" with the fascists. He also wants Israel to change
Hatikva and take the Star of David off the flag. (Haaretz Dec 29 - Tom
Segev’s column) Of course, living in such intimate terms with ex-Nazis
has no doubt made him excessively understanding and sensitive to the demands
of the PLO.
But I still have my own original ideas of what he should do with his
baton ….
The commission of inquiry was known as the Kahan Commission.
Now something interesting is happening in Israel. A Netanya lawyer
named Yosef Dar has written a book about the Kahan Commission and it claims
to have a grand set of scoops. I have not read it yet, only its reviews,
and it sounds impressive and well-researched.
Essentially, Dar’s most controversial theme is that not only was Sharon
entirely blameless, but the person in Israel most directly responsible for
the massacre was none other than Itzhak Zamir, at the time the legal advisor
to the government (effectively the Attorney General) and later named to the
Supreme Court bench and Dean at the law school at the University of Haifa.
Zamir was personally present at the cabinet meeting in 1982 in which it was
proposed to allow the Christian Falange militia to enter Sabra and Shatilla,
something confirmed in Haaretz. Zamir, despite his name (song bird), said
absolutely nothing, raised no objections, pointed out no legal or moral
problems.
SO how come Zamir’s name was never muddied in all the hoopla that came
after the massacre? How come only Sharon was left with the mud on his face?
Cause among the members of the Kahan Commission of Inquiry was another
judge, a buddy of Zamir, who decided to cover his friend’s derrier!! And
who was this other justice with the selective pointed finger? None other
than Mister Judicial Activism himself, today’s Chief Justice of the Supreme
Court, friend of Orthodox-bashers everywhere, Aharon Barak. Haaretz Dec
29, 00.
Anyway, I was reminded of this when I noticed that the Jerusalem Post
carried a review of a new book entitled, "The Religious Practices of Reform
Jews." I have not read it but assume it is a gag gift, a book of 300 blank
pages and then on the last page it says Vote for Hillary.
Copyright © 2000 by Steven Plaut. -Published with permission
© 1999, 2000 by OpinioNet(tm), All Rights Reserved |