|
Date - June 11, 2001
The Oswald Mosley of Israel
Azmi Bashara is a Knesset Member from one of the Arab Stalinist Fascist
parties in Israel. Bashara has a long history of calling for Israel to be
annihilated and for supporting escalated terrorist activity against Jews.
That of course is all protected free speech in post-Rabin Israel. Bashara
has also been paying regular homage to Syria and its Hizbullah surrogate
forces. He has never been prosecuted for treason, unlike Oswald Mosley in
Britain during the 1940s. (Mosley was the head of the pro-Nazi British
fascists. See http://motlc.wiesenthal.com/pages/t052/t05207.html) Mosley,
unlike Bashara, spent the war in prison. Put there by Churchill. (Of
course Israel has been ruled by a series of Chamberlain’s.)
When Yitzhak Rabin died, Bashara denounced him as a "mass murderer".
The Attorney General did nothing, preferring instead to throw into jail all
those Jews who said "Got his comeuppance" about Rabin. In any case, as you
probably know, Bashara was in Syria yesterday for the one-year anniversary
of the death of Hafez al-Asad. Sitting fang-to-fang with the head of
Hizbollah and with Ahmed Jibril, Bashara gave a speech calling for all Arabs
to unite to eliminate Israel.
Now you may recall that three years back the New Israel Fund adopted
Bashara as its official mascot. The New Israel Fund is a leftist Tikkunesque
fund in the US that raises money for politically correct causes in Israel.
It funds gay groups, religious "pluralism" groups, but its main contribution
is to funnel money into the countless tiny Marxist or communist-front
"peace" groups, which would not exist without the New Israel Fund, things
like Uri Avnery and the Women in Black and "Bat Shalom", and so on. The
"New Israel" that the New Israel Fund seeks to fund is in fact Palestine.
Three years ago, the New Israel Fund managed to hornswaggle the
Smithsonian Institute into letting IT organize festivities to mark Israel’s
50th year, and who do you think the NIF decided should represent Israel?
None other than Azmi Bashara, of course!! Just a typical sabra, kova
tembel and all, eating felafel and melon!!
Of course Bashara is as representative of Israel as is the NIF of US
Jewry. The New Israel Fund in fact planned to invite several others to
stage one of those familiar Jewish-Arab unity events in which Jewish
leftists join Arab fascists in calling for Israel to be destroyed.
At the time, the valiant Americans for a Safe Israel (www.afsi.org) had
a word in the ear of the Smithsonian, which - once it discovered who and
what the New Israel Fund actually was - cancelled the taxpayer-funded jihad.
The Tikkunies of the New Israel Fund then went on a rampage and screamed
about "McCarthyism" and suppression.
Meanwhile, the Attorney General in Israel says he will look into
Bashara’s speech yesterday, but rest assured: In post-survivalist Israel,
Arab fascists are NEVER prosecuted for calling for violence or for treason.
You know, unlike those street folks whisked off to jail for throwing rocks
at the Tel Aviv mosque after the 20 schoolchildren were blown up by the PLO
last week.
Of course, the Attorney General is looking - as usual - under the wrong
streetlight. He should be instead prosecuting those morons who let Bashara
go to Syria in the first place, and - even more so - those greater morons
who let him come back in.
Speaking of whining Tikkunies screaming oppression, you may have noticed
that Michael Lerner, the editor of Tikkun, and Arthur Waskow, his Allen
Ginzberg guru, have been taking to the US Jewish press to moan that Lerner
is the victim of violent threats. This on the basis of Lerner having
received "threatening" emails. And how do we know that Lerner got
threatening emails? Well, he says so! Just see his recent column in the
Los Angeles Times!
Now do we have any reason NOT to take Lerner’s claims that he got
threatening emails at face value? Yes we have plenty. Lerner is a liar.
The Philadelphia Inquirer already exposed him for having fabricated letters
to the editor of Tikkun agreeing with himself. Lerner has claimed for years
to be a Rabbi, when he has no Rabbinic training nor ordination whatsoever,
other than three other hippies laying their hands on his head and saying,
"May the Force be With You." And Lerner and Waskow have been moaning that
they are the victims of persecution by a conservative Republican US Jewish
establishment ever since the 1960s, waving about their stigmata for all
progressives to see. Even Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post got in on Lerner’s
charade and ran the story about his getting "threats".
The web site that Lerner claims inspired the "threats" he got is
masada2000.org, which is worth a visit to decide for yourself.
Israeli Army Weekly Missing for Actions
Press: It is ordered closed after a cover story on a colonel who became a
gay-rights activist. Other controversial topics also rankled brass.
By TRACY WILKINSON, Times Staff Writer (Sunday, June 10, 2001)
Senior officers ordered the Bamahane newsmagazine closed after a cover
story showcased a now-retired gay colonel who had come out of the closet
during his military service and went on to become an activist in the
gay-rights movement.
The shutdown is part of a tug of war over how the publication can best
reflect the identity of Israel’s fighting forces. In the backdrop is the
conflict between the seemingly mutually exclusive worlds of press freedom
and the military.
Until about a year ago, Bamahane (which means "In the Camp") had to submit
all of its stories to the army spokesman’s office for screening and
"editing" before publication. Since then, pressure to toe a certain line
remains, but the editors have been given more license and they have been
eagerly testing the limits, with varying degrees of success.
In Israel, almost all Jewish citizens are drafted and obliged to perform
reserve duty for many years after their mandatory service is completed.
Consequently, this "people’s army" expects publications that are more
relevant and grass-roots than institutional. Many of the country’s
professional journalists fulfill their reserve duty at Bamahane or other
army media.
In addition to the gay colonel feature, articles published in Bamahane have
recently addressed alcoholism among the troops; dissent over controversial
operations in Lebanon; the repeated blunders of state intelligence; and the
neglect of female soldiers injured in the line of duty, in contrast to the
preferential treatment afforded their male colleagues.
Another recent cover featured the photograph of a shirtless
paratrooper-turned-male-model, complete with chiseled body and come-hither
pose. To boot, he was a former ultra-Orthodox yeshiva boy who had defected
from the religious life. He was quoted as saying that he’d rather be
starring on the catwalk than patrolling Arab villages.
This is not your father’s Stars and Stripes.
Bamahane won praise in many circles for having broken out of the staid,
officious world of army-speak and for addressing sensitive, once-taboo
topics.
But the stories irritated some officers in the army’s upper echelon who
believed that the more titillating reports simply went too far. And the gay
colonel, one army insider said, was "the last straw."
Brig. Gen. Elazar Stern, the chief education officer who oversees military
publications, ordered the weekly closed until further notice because of
material that "depicts the army in a negative light."
Neither Stern nor anyone else in the army public information office would
comment for the record on this case, and Bamahane’s editor, Rami Keidar,
was forbidden to talk to the media.
Past writers at the paper blame Stern for continuing to try to impose
censorship. Stern has earned attention in the mainstream press, mostly for
several less-than-progressive statements. He was quoted in March, for
example, as suggesting that non-Jews make inferior soldiers.
Others put forward that Bamahane had indeed gone a little overboard,
reflecting a yuppie, Tel Aviv-centric personality seen as elitist and out
of touch with many of the troops.
Bamahane will probably be allowed to resume publication in a matter of
weeks or months, officials said. But its tone then is anyone’s guess.
"It will bid farewell to an editor or two, and then will revert to what it
has always been," complained political activist Orna Oshri, writing last
month in the Haaretz newspaper. "A boring, polite and squeaky-clean rag,
the Pravda of a scared, heterosexual, narrow-minded army. It will then be
necessary to find out who needs such a wretched product anyway."
best
Gershon
Copyright © 2001 by Steven Plaut. -Published with permission
© 1999-2001 by OpinioNet(tm), All Rights Reserved |