OpinioNet Contributed Commentary - Timothy Rollins <tim@opinionet.com>
March 29, 2002
 |
"Beneath the Surface"
Secret Sleazy Signings and Other Things
|
President George W. Bush (R-TX)
|
In
what can only be described as sleazy and with only Press Secretary Ari Fleischer
and an Oval Office secretary watching, President Bush (right) signed into law
the Campaign Finance Reform Bill yesterday. Not only did he make a significant
leap into muzzling free speech yesterday, he also succeeded in doing a few other
things yesterday as well - none of which I thought possible.
For openers, he showed himself to be even more secretive than Clinton when
Slick Willie signed EO 13083 entitled "Federalism" while in England that essentially
stripped away states rights - an action that was later suspended when the individual
states (led by Utah Governor Mike Leavitt) brought sufficient pressure to bear
to have the EO suspended.
In addition, Bush also did not invite the sponsors of the bill and he succeeded
in bringing together the strangest of bedfellows I’ve seen in the 30 years I’ve
been in politics. Now I’ve seen some unusual and even some downright unholy
alliances in politics like Rush Limbaugh and Bill Clinton, but the lawsuit filed
yesterday afternoon after the signing reads like a who’s who of odd couples,
most notably led by the National Rifle Association (NRA) and the American Civil
Liberties Union (ACLU).
Among the other provisions of this legislation is a ban on soft money, and
a prohibition on television ads paid for by special interest groups in the final
days of an election season. Notice how all this is designed to protect incumbents
in such a manner that is virtually impossible to speak out against said incumbent
within X number of days prior to either a primary or a general election, thus
ensuring the incumbent a free ride all the way to yet another term for as long
as either he or she wants the job. Funny thing about this is that none of this
takes effect until AFTER the general mid-term elections in November - convenient,
huh?
Former Governor James Gilmore (R-VA)
|
Meanwhile,
in the "Score One for the Good Guys" department, former Virginia Governor Jim
Gilmore and head of the Republican National Committee, who now heads the congressionally-appointed
anti-terror commission reported that while he fully expected another attack
on American soil the likes of 9-11 (or possibly worse), that the proposed knee-jerk
security measures will do little good other than significantly intrude on civil
liberties. Gilmore described the idea of a national ID card as "too creepy for
me." Perfectly put!
Hallelujah! A Republican (or American government official) with the integrity
to recognize the truth! As one who travels back and forth across the U.S./Canada
border on a regular, I was thoroughly interviewed at the border on my first
crossing after 9-11. When I crossed the border in January, I made the crossing
in all of four seconds. CBS’ newsmagazine 60 MINUTES recently exposed
the risks faced by our seaports and the target-rich environment they provided
to terrorists.
In addition, the only ones who would gain from the idea of a national ID card
would be that opportunistic idiot Larry Ellison of Oracle, and we all know his
motive - money for himself and the exploitation of a national tragedy for monetary
gain; and another would be Harris Miller, the president and CEO of the International
Technology Association of America, who promotes the building of a national database
for pretty much the same reasons - not helping America, but rather, helping
himself.
Meanwhile, you have Marvin Langston, a vice president with SAIC (Science Applications
International Corporation) suggesting a VOLUNTARY ID card - yeah, right - sure.
And if you believe that one, I have a bridge in Brooklyn I’d like to sell you.
When asked, Gilmore said he is concerned that Americans are needlessly being
forced to believe they must give up their fundamental rights for the benefit
of security. He said that has already happened with the advent of traffic light
cameras to stop errant motorists and surveillance cameras on the streets.
As I see it, the idea of Americans having to give up their rights because
of some fanatics who claim to be Muslims runs counter to the American spirit,
and those who feel that we should ought to consider relocating to another country
where these rights do not exist. These rights have been a fundamental part of
our being as a nation since our humble beginnings over 225 years ago; for those
who don’t realize that, may I suggest you break out an American History book,
for those who fail to learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat
them.
Timothy Rollins