I am already quite sick of hearing Democrat candidates say that we have to "improve America's standing in the world" as if the whole world holds our nation in contempt or disagrees with our actions.
All nations act upon what they believe to be their best interests and those interests are often shaped by their political philosophy. These things are subject to change. For example, there are some 200 sovereign nations in the world. Of these, 120 are multi-party democracies. Compare this with 1970 when there were fewer than 35 nations that were not outright dictatorships or operating under the iron fist of the single party rule of Communism.
One might conclude from this that democracy is catching on around the world and that in this new century most people want some form of representative government for their nation.
This is what inspires Buddhist monks to risk their lives to march against the military dictators in Burma (now Myanmar). This is what provokes outrage in the former Soviet satellite of Georgia when the rule of law is suspended or, most dramatically, when lawyers and judges, along with others, pour into the streets of Pakistan when its president seeks to extend his term in office by declaring an emergency and martial law.
Where did these nations and people learn about democracy and representative government? For the most part, the United States of America has been both the example and the instrument for the spread of these concepts.
Our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution are studied to learn the basic principles of self-rule and proper governance "of the people, by the people, and for the people."
So, when Democrats cry out that America's image has been tarnished by the decision to rid the Middle East of a threat to every other nation in the region-Saddam Hussein and his Baathist government-I suspect the leaders of the nations most threatened greeted the decision with relief. As to the "Arab street", the print and broadcast media in many nations of the region is aggressively anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, and anti-American.
An agreement between the Bush Administration and the Iraqi government will ensure a drawdown of our troops there and the long term billeting of 50,000. Iraq is on its way to being a modern, democratic nation. Our common enemy, al Qaeda, has been targeted for elimination and, when Iraq's oil contributes more fully to the global market, watch the price of a barrel drop in response.
Who then openly despises the United States of America? Hugo Chavez, a vile dictator in Venezuela, for one. Recently the King of Spain told him bluntly to "shut up." Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is a vocal opponent of America, but much of his nation's population would, if they could, rid themselves of the ayatollahs and embrace America as an ally.
Vladimir Putin, successor to the leaders of the former Soviet Union, sees America as an obstacle to his ambitions to restore Russia to superpower status. A recent visit to Iran, however, disabused him of the notion that he was dealing with rational leaders there.
In contrast, the new president of France, Nicholas Sarkozy, recently gave a stirring speech to our Congress, praising the role of America in the world. Indeed, throughout Europe, the protection that America still extends to that continent is appreciated and many, if only symbolically, sent contingents of military to support our efforts to rid Afghanistan of the Taliban and to assist in Iraq.
Asia recognizes the role America still plays in the support of democracy for its nations and the protection of its sea-lanes upon which they depend for the export of goods and raw materials. Having fostered democracy in Japan following WWII, that nation is quietly assuming a comparable role in the protection of democracy, building a modern military after decades of reluctance to accept that necessity.
While North Korea remains a prison to its people, South Korea is a thriving democratic state. China remains Communist, but has accepted Capitalism as its economic engine and will open its doors still further to the world for the 2008 Olympics.
Perhaps the best measure of confidence in America is the direct foreign investment (DFI) in our nation. U.S. Department of State figures as of 2004 reveal that, as of three years ago, DFI was $1.5 trillion on a historical cost basis or, as of 2006, $2.7 trillion at market value of publicly traded firms. European firms accounted for 70% of DFI, followed by Asia and Pacific firms. Hardly a day goes by without reports of new foreign investment.
Only those vile few who hate freedom want America to fail.
The greatest critics of America are often Americans, forever striving to improve every sector of its national life. America is not above criticism, but it remains a nation that is by far the most dynamic, most innovative, most devoted to the rule of law and equality for all its citizens.
Americans need not worry much about "restoring" our standing among the nations of the world. We are held in very good standing, thank you.