Responding To Cries Of “Racism”

As a conservative, aren’t you beyond tired of your common-sense positions being labeled by radical leftists as “racist” or “fascist”? Isn’t it about time we started to fight fire by fighting back? I think so, and the leftists present such a target-rich environment. 

At this point, it’s not much of a stretch to call out leftist Democrats as “anti-American” because what they wish to do to this country is to (1) burn it down in its current form, and (2) totally remake it in their (socialist/communist) image. Just because millions of “Normie Norms” don’t wish to acknowledge this doesn’t make it any less true. “Well, they just hate Trump, not America.” Really? 

Yes, I agree that they hate Trump with the intensity of a thousand suns, but, independent of that, there’s little about America as currently constituted that they like either. Proof of this has come in past and current statements from Democrat leaders, and will continue to come during this midterm election cycle and the upcoming presidential race. You can be sure that conservative candidates are trashed by the left even though their last name is not Trump, and even as they offer common-sense solutions to our vast array of problems.

And speaking of vitriol, all one needs to do is pay attention to the almost daily spewing of leftist rhetoric from the House Minority Leader, who’s now saying that Dems need to “break the spirit” of MAGA Republicans. The hatred that Jeffries and other Dems have for Trump supporters is worthy of their worst enemies. To them, we’re the Hatfields and they’re the McCoys. It makes one wonder, what is it that motivates them toward such hatred and contempt? To answer this question, I think we need to dig a little deeper.

In my previous article about “unhuman” Democrats, I cited the recently published and NY Times best-seller Unhumans: The Secret History of Communist Revolutions, by Jack Posobiec and Joshua Lisec. As part of their in-depth review of Mao’s communist revolution in China, it was noted that the Nationalist regime of Chiang Kai-Shek could have prevailed had we provided them with adequate financial and military aid. Why didn’t we? Well, the authors’ research led to the rather unsettling conclusion that American leadership, spearheaded by Secretary of State George C. Marshall (author of the Marshall Plan), felt that allowing Mao to win would keep the Soviets out of the conflict, thus avoiding a possible World War III. But there was another twist that may have motivated Marshall and those in the government with similar beliefs about the post-World War II world. 

After experiencing two world wars in a 30-year period, American leadership was far more receptive about our joining the newly formed United Nations than we were about the ill-fated League of Nations after World War I. No one gave much thought at the time to what such membership would do to devalue and erode our national sovereignty over time, or, if they did, they kept it under their hats. But that is exactly what has happened. Ever since President George H.W. Bush uttered those infamous words after the liberation of Eastern Europe and the collapse of the former Soviet Union, “new world order,” the UN and its adherents, including many powerful U.S. politicians, have pushed us increasingly toward “one-world government.” 

Knowing that America in its present form would never submit to this plan, but a socialist America would, today’s Democrats, in their desperation to regain power, have let their masks slip recently in their public comments. Hakeem Jeffries is just one of many, but in his position as the potential next Speaker of the House, his already loud voice carries further than most. When Jeffries and others constantly accuse Trump and his supporters of “threatening democracy,” that is just their coded language for how they see their “enemy” as a major roadblock in the way of their objectives. Their accusations of “racism” when Republican governors implement redistricting plans must be understood in the same way – our side is seen as the “enemy” which must be stopped, not as fellow Americans. 

We’ve reached an unfortunate point where, if we want the United States as constituted to survive, we will need to fight for that. How that fight may take shape now and in the future is anyone’s guess, but rest assured, it will not be easy. As another Memorial Day comes and goes, the ultimate sacrifice of the service members who came before us must never be in vain.