"You shall know the Truth, and the Truth will set you free"
Publisher / Editor:
Paul Hayden

Obama’s Rough Road Ahead

October 15, 2012


The October 3rd debate ought to have been Obama’s easiest to win. Although the economy is in ghastly shape, Obama’s Marxist-lite rhetoric panders to the envy and greed of millions of Americans. The Democrat campaign bet heavily upon painting Romney as a rich investor with rich pals who had no idea how ordinary Americans lived. Blaming misery on the successful has been the Democrat playbook since FDR (despite the fact that FDR, JFK, Al Gore and John Kerry were all multi-millionaires.)

Polls suggested that this ploy was working again. It is not. The debate showed just how indefensible the Left, as the malefactor of great government wealth, to put a twist of Teddy Roosevelt’s famous slogan, really is to ordinary people. While there were reasons to hope that Romney could outperform Obama in this first debate – Romney is much smarter than Obama; Romney has actually faced fighting opponents in many campaigns; and the promises of Obama in 2008 have failed so badly - what Romney did was actually expose the emptiness and hopelessness of the Left’s economic program.

What happened on Wednesday will create interest in the next three debates. If nothing else, the buzz about how poorly Obama performed will interest viewers who might not have otherwise turned in for the remaining debates. The solid Romney performance will enthuse Republicans and dishearten Democrats. The Democrat ticket could turn things around in the remaining three debates, but in fact things will get progressively worse for Obama in these debates.

Consider what will happen on October 11. Joe Biden, the 69-year-old gaffe-prone politician, whose benefit to Democrats has been that he makes Obama look smart, will face off against the very smart, very fit 42-year-old Paul Ryan. Romney set the tone: Republicans will defend our positions on issues like entitlements. Ryan is the man who can run circles around a hack like Biden.

Ryan not only has youth, intelligence and ideas on his side: Ryan and Romney have won campaigns in which most of the voters were Democrats and independents. Biden has no clue how to appeal to anything but the Democrat base. Moreover, Ryan practically exudes confidence and optimism. He is as close to Reagan as Republicans have had in the last quarter century. What does Biden exude? Shopworn clichés and smugness.

On October 18, Romney and Obama will face questions from undecided voters selected by Gallup in a town hall style debate. Although this might seem a mine field, it actually is the perfect time for Romney to outdo Obama in the single area in which Obama has continued to do well in the polls: likeability.

Both will get hostile questions during the town hall. While Obama is notoriously thin-skinned, Romney has consistently over the last 18 years in politics been polite, calm and controlled. If Romney simply comes out of this debate as likeable as Obama, he wins. If Obama snaps at some citizen-questioner or seems disengaged, then Romney wins big. Romney cannot “lose” on October 18.

The last debate on October 22 will be on foreign policy. There is a myth that presidents succeed politically when foreign policy and national security is a shambles. Elections show otherwise. In 1918, Democrats paid heavily for Wilson bringing America into the world war. In 1942, less than a year after the “rally ‘round the flag” Pearl Harbor sentiment, Republicans made huge gains in both houses of Congress.

Korea was a principal reason why Democrats lost in 1952 and Vietnam was a big reason why Democrats lost both 1966 and 1968. Although Carter was probably a goner in 1980, the ineptness of his handling of the Americans held hostage in Iran was the nail in his political coffin. Bush was hurt by our long wars in West Asia in 2006 and Obama won, in part, because of that in 2008.

Moreover, Obama has opened himself up by egotistically portraying himself as an expert on foreign policy, while Romney has been presented as someone who cannot be trusted with national security. The natural modesty of Romney and the natural arrogance of Obama will blend into a “Perfect Storm” for Republicans.

In no area of his presidency has Obama been more conspicuously incompetent as in foreign relations. There are so many areas in which Obama could get zinged that it is hard to predict which will hurt the most. The murder of our Libyan ambassador with abusive treatment of an American filmmaker as a notional culprit? The creeping certainty that Iran will become a nuclear power? The slandering of the Polish people with his “death camp” comment? What is strikingly clear is that there is nothing – absolutely nothing – good that has come to America in the world because of Obama.

The first debate was very bad for Barry. The next three will be catastrophic.


Comments: 0
You!
Note:
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
2500 characters max
    
Copyright ©2012 Bruce Walker

Bruce Walker is a long-time conservative writer whose work is published regularly at popular conservative sites such as American Thinker.