Everything About Obama’s Presidency is ‘Not Optimal’

President Obama sure has a way with words. His response to Jon Stewart when asked about the terrorist attacks Benghazi was to say, “‘If four Americans get killed, it’s not optimal.” The fact is that nothing has been “optimal” about Obama’s Presidency. So why should Benghazi be any different?

Remember Obama’s stimulus plan? The one that was supposed to prevent unemployment from rising about eight percent? Certainly that was “not optimal” considering that it failed miserably.

Obamacare, which was promised to help reduce the cost of healthcare, even though everyone with a brain knew it wouldn’t, has not worked. Again, “not optimal.”

Obama’s bailout of certain US auto companies, which we are still losing money on, cannot be considered “optimal” by any objective measure.

Trillion dollar plus deficits for every year since President Obama ascended to on high in Washington, D.C. certainly doesn’t seem very “optimal” either.

Welfare spending through the roof and more people on the government dole? Doesn’t really rank as being “optimal” if you ask me.

Throwing millions of dollars at green energy frauds like Solyndra and A123 Systems? Only to have them go bankrupt and leave taxpayers holding the bag? In no way “optimal.”

President Obama only being able to crack fifty percent in the polls this election year when Democrats are oversampled by wide margins? Definitely not very “optimal” for his reelection chances.

Getting his butt handed to him in two consecutive debates while Vice President Joe Biden looked like the Joker in another? Once again, “not optimal.”

Yes, so many things about President Obama’s term have been “not optimal.” I could go on, but I think you get the picture. Hopefully, very soon, we will start to optimize America. But first, we have to get rid of the buffoon currently residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.