Why Give Obama a Pass on his Scandal Claims?

August 12, 2013

President Barack Obama is referring to the investigation of current administration scan­dals as “phony.” Is it possible that a “phony” dimension to the scandals is from his administra­tion and not the congressional committees investigating them?

For example, was it not pho­ny for President Obama and for­mer Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, at the ceremony for the arrival of the bodies of the dead heroes of Benghazi, to refer to a video as the cause of their deaths and not a terrorist attack which they knew to be a fact days before the ceremony?

Was it not phony for the ad­ministration to blame a “couple rogue agents in the IRS in Cin­cinnati” for harassing conser­vative groups applying for tax­ exempt status when it was sub­sequently determined that the harassment originated in Wash­ington?

Was it not phony for Attor­ney General Eric Holder to claim he would never accuse re­porters of participating in spy­ing when he, several days be­fore, signed off on an order to investigate a reporter for such activity?

Is it not troubling that the media follows President Obama around the country, reporting his “phony scandal” accusation, without pointing out these in­consistencies and their conse­quences? To quote John Ad­ams’s line in the movie “1776:” “Is anybody there? Does any­body care?”

Comments: 0
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
2500 characters max
Copyright ©2013