The Law of the Land

An excellent essay by a young high school student with much insight!

April 15, 2019

How many of you believe that Congress makes the laws of our land? How many of you believe presidential executive orders are also the law of our land? How many of you believe the Supreme Court’s decisions are the law of our land?

In the United States Constitution, our Founding Fathers gave the American people a government of three distinct branches. Our Constitution clearly dictates which of these three branches makes the laws of our land, and what the duties of the other two branches are, regarding those laws.

Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution states: “All legislative power [law-making power] herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States[.]”

According to our Constitution then, all laws are made in Congress. This is how:

1. A congressman drafts a bill.
2. He submits it to the floor.
3. It is sent to a committee.
4. It is discussed and sent back to the floor.
5. It is discussed and voted on.
6. It passes.
7. It is sent to the other house.
8. The same process - 3-6 above.
9. If it passes, it is sent to the president.
10. The president can sign the bill, or veto it, or do nothing, in which case the bill becomes law after ten days.

There, that’s how Congress makes laws - the condensed version.

Now how many of you believe presidential executive orders are the law of the land?

Remember that word all? “All legislative power...shall be vested in a congress.” That leaves no law-making power leftover for the president. His executive orders are for the sole purpose of enforcing the Constitution as prescribed in Article II Section 3 “He shall take care that the laws (made by Congress) be faithfully executed.” Again I say, the president’s role in the government is to preserve and protect the Constitution and to enforce, not make, our country’s laws.

Suppose the president issued an executive order that all Americans had to worship at a Lutheran church. Not only is there no such law passed by Congress, but that executive order is a blatant violation of the First Amendment, which states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Since this executive order is not enforcing a law, but trying to make a new one, and because this order would violate the First Amendment and deprive citizens of their treasured freedom to worship as they please, the president is overstepping his Constitutional bounds, and the order should be struck down.

On the other hand, suppose a president made an executive order restricting immigration from certain countries. Article IV Section 4 states that the executive branch shall: “Protect each of them [the states] from invasion.” In addition, Congress has passed a statutory law stating:

“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may...impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

This order to restrict immigration is therefore perfectly legal. Some may disagree with it, but it is still very much in line with the president’s first and foremost duty, to protect the American people by enforcing the Constitution and the laws of Congress.

Finally, how many of you still believe that Supreme Court decisions are the law of the land? Again I remind you, the first sentence of the Constitution vests ALL legislative powers in a Congress. That leaves nothing left for the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court’s function is to discover and apply the Constitution and the laws of Congress to the cases brought before them and to strike down laws that violate the Constitution. They are not to judge based on their personal bias. They are to judge based on the Constitution. Moreover, they have no jurisdiction unless a case is appealed to them. Even then, their opinions apply only to the case on which they have ruled, not to the entire country. Their opinions are not law!

Consider this, in 1857, Chief Justice Roger Taney ruled in Dredd Scott v. Sanford that African-Americans had no rights which white men were bound to respect. In 1927, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes ruled in Buck v. Bell that mentally disabled women could be sterilized “for the protection and health of the State.”

Dredd Scott and Buck v. Bell have never been overturned. If Supreme court decisions carry the force of law, then why do African-Americans have rights, and why aren’t we forcibly sterilizing every intellectually disabled woman? The answer is this: the Supreme Court does not make laws. Their decisions do not need to be overturned. They are just opinions. They are not law and can be ignored as we have been rightly ignoring Dredd Scott and Buck v. Bell for decades.

Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that “legalized” abortion, is not law. Obergefell v. Hodge, the Supreme Court decision that “legalized” same-sex marriage in all 50 states, is not law.

These are simply opinions. Congress and Congress alone makes the laws of our land - not the president, and not the Supreme Court.

When we know how our government is supposed to work, we should be appalled by what we see today. Whenever the courts make decisions not based on the Constitution and the law but instead based on their personal bias, they are neglecting their duties. And when they declare rulings on things over which the Constitution is silent, or declare rulings that have no Constitutional foundation, they are overstepping their bounds.

When the president makes executive orders not to enforce the law, but to make new laws, he is overstepping his Constitutional bounds. When he refuses to enforce laws that Congress has made, he is neglecting his duties.

When Congress neglects to exercise their Constitutional power of impeachment against those who break the law, or when they won’t compromise across party lines in order to pass good legislation, they are neglecting their duties.

The president doesn’t make laws, he can only enforce them. The Supreme court doesn’t make laws, it can only discover and apply them. Only Congress makes laws. Executive orders are to enforce the laws; Supreme Court decisions are opinions about the laws; but Congress and Congress alone holds the law-making authority in the United States of America.

[First published on the Institute of the Constitution.]

Comments: 2
  1. Email address is REQUIRED, in case we need to contact you about your comment. However, we will not display or use your email address for any purpose other than to contact you about this comment.
  2. Nickname should be a short nickname that you choose to use. Please do NOT enter your full, real name. Nickname will be displayed along with your comment.
  3. Comments will not appear on our website until they have been reviewed by our Editorial Team. Inappropriate messages will be rejected by the Editorial Team. Free speech is important here at ConservativeTruth, however, the Editorial Team reserves the absolute right to determine what content appears on this website.
    • Comments that contain foul language, profanity or vulgarity will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain links will be rejected. (send email to the editor if you wish to let us know about another website)
    • Comments that advertise a product or service will be rejected.
    • Comments that contain email addresses will be rejected.
2500 characters max
Jacob Schulz: Someone once said there are three kinds of people, "Those who make things happen, those who watch things happen, and those who wonder what happened". I'm certain you will be one of the few who makes things happen. Keep up the good work, and keep writing.
A job WELL DONE by this Young Man!!! I am just guessing that he is Home Schooled. Sadly, what he has written here is the equivalent of a foreign language in most public schools. My only question for the author and readers would be "What does he mean when he says that the Job of the Judicial Branch is to "Discover" the law. My comment is that Congress has allowed the impeachment process to become political. That must stop. And I also wonder if the author's reason for impeachment "Breaking the Law" includes Governmental oath takers disobeying their SWORN Oaths of Office?
Copyright ©2019

Jacob Schulz is a middle-school student, with a strong interest in American Government. He has a talent for seeing clearly, and writing well.